financializaciónen la acumulación capitalista es factor inequívoco (con la desre-gulación y especulación que le acompañan), que impulsa un riesgoso
desorden globalsignado por interrupciones en el proceso de producción y de la acumulación de capital, quiebras, desplomes bancarios y pánicos financieros semanales, aumento desmesurado unemployment and underemployment, greater polarization of income, class war, strikes, labor strikes, lockouts : which erupted in 2007 is a great depression rate dynamics in the past led to disasters mi-militaries, although today orders of magnitude, complexity and violence are ma-OLDER, economic, military and environmental.
The bottom line, present in the aetiology of war, focuses on geopolitización
of international economic relations (finance, trade, currency) by an aggressive hegemon in crisis and military-industrial mobilization. It is known that the more volatile elements are economic, political and social mi-militaries within the general climate that affects the accumulation, the less likely it is that capitalists accumulate through the production: in the midst of a growing depletion of conventional natural resources (fossil fuels, minerals, metals, Cheap, high quality and easily accessible, including water, biodiversity and atmospheric accelerated deterioration Rado) the potential for environmental destruction and intensifying war intensifies and extends to levels of irreversibility
terminal.
high net responses in the ecological-economic guarantee of disaster. In the G-20, submitted by States Attached to the joint short-term goals to suit the financial and business unit, which governs the recovery and the free flow of capital, emphasis is partial exits, unable to respond to systemic and comprehensive nature of the crisis. Its summit
the end of 2010, incapable of offering real alternative to the collapse we face, prepared the agenda for business and especulacilón with nature.
The threat that the fiasco of the Copenhagen Agreement (AC) extends to the Cancun Summit (COP-16) is real. There is, as noted by Jayati Ghosh (March 2010 Report), which hailed the long run-up to AC, "... organizers have the ambition to really change course and stop or reverse a clearly unsustainable growth process ¨.
high resistance was felt capital: profit, private use and enjoyment of natural resources and accountability to investors is a priority.
Looking to COP-16 (Nov29-Dic10) the picture is bleak: as with the G-20, the goal is to ensure the needs and interests of the big monopolies against which, rather than a crisis like 1929 was shaping up as an abysmal economic collapse, ecological and military stakes in the biochemical framework that allows human existence on cortex. But in capitalism prevails, in essence, the expansion of profit, even lead to self-destruction, genocide and ecocide: according to official documents unveiled by John Vidal (The Guardian 12-IV-10), the strategy United States for the COP-16 is privileged, "reinforce the perception (sic ) of the United States is committed to negotiations ... to bring forward a comprehensive regime to combat climate change."
The idea is to manage expectations
(verbatim): with a clear message on the status of AC and the importance of implementing all (their) elements
. Ie U.S. will not negotiate
items not included in the AC and try to Cancun package offered by the AC as binding under
take it or leave. AC has been associated
110 countries, but has not been adopted
by the 192 nations of the UN Convention as the United States blackmails countries that do not match the AC, denying
help.
0 comments:
Post a Comment