Mexico could not resist an invasion , so that did not require armed forces, what happened was predictable: the PRI leadership in Salinas at odds with the Cuban resistance capitulated to the imperial bullying:
said security in Mexico is part of the United States national security
to absorb its foreign policy agenda in the United States.
PAN In consolidating the nation's transition to protectorate: the war on narco
emphasizes the
bilateralization internal security, while its use anti-union (to induce electricity privatization) and political-electoral ( michoacanazo
insurgency," extending the range of repression. Northern Command (CN) announces that based on experience (in fighting) that have acquired U.S. forces in Afghanistan and Iraq is
... working with Mexico's armed forces confronting them with the idea that the enemy lives among civilians and not an external enemy country, as traditionally has trained Mexican army and navy . The CN ensures the sovereignty of Mexico, but in fact the settlement by absorbing Mexico into the security perimeter United States: in 1848 half the country. Now the plan appears to be throughout Mexico Whose armed forces are trained in specific areas, says CN,
... are needed to transform the military, a conventional force designed to combat external threats to an army that has to deal with irregular warfare where the enemy civilian lives (sic
is the model for Latin America:
Mexicans divided and atomised civil war , Ramiro Guerra recalls when reviewing the events of 1848,
... could not form a united front during the war to resist more strongly in defense of the integrity of his country ... It was not possible in such conditions, while remaining a line of least resistance to foreign invasion .
0 comments:
Post a Comment