September 2010

Thursday, September 23, 2010

Mini Sand Rail Building Plans

EU: narcopotencia

Who gave you the right (United States) to include or exclude or fail to meet commitments in the international fight against drug trafficking?

Nobody has that right and if anyone would have UN. This was the response from Hugo Chavez to the inclusion of Venezuela in a memorandum from the White House State Department's list

countries not cooperating in combating anti-narco

. The document also promotes greater involvement and occupation of Central America with the excuse that

out war in Mexico and Colombia narco forced to fall back Honduras, Costa Rica and Nicaragua for the first time included in list of major producers of drug trafficking or platforms in the world . As expected and the government of Laura Chinchilla, Costa Rica, which authorized the U.S. military presence in its territory, offering immunity to the occupation soldiers and officers who committed breaches of international criminal law, leading an American initiative to to U.S. pressure after more aid against narco .

The memorandum is also used in the case of Venezuela, with political and electoral purposes. Their bias opportunistic, unilateral and partial, with the increasingly notorious U.S. involvement in all levels of the structure and dynamics of drug trafficking, disallowed the rhetoric of anti-narco war

/ crime is, what the war psychological and political history is known as hedge, the partition that covers popular campaigns against and design of intervention and occupation police / military / corporate key areas of its geographic position or their resources. is no coincidence that they be military, Colonel Hugo Chavez or Castro Sued Lima, the Brazilian Air Force, who, among others, calling attention to the phenomenon: The United States stands as judge of others, while applying the domain overwhelming and is the main beneficiary of the Great Ones businesses from drug trafficking and organized crime. Castro Lima ( www.adital.com.br

) show how untenable the argument of anti-drug front of the White House:

in Colombia, cocaine production increased porque también lo hizo el mercado concentrado en Estados Unidos y en años recientes el precio de la cocaína cayó 36 por ciento resultado del aumento de la oferta y no de una reducción de la demanda .

Esos y otros datos indican que a nivel internacional Estados Unidos se perfila como la principal

narcopotencia : es gran productor de mariguana y los más de 7 millones de adictos a la cocaína que la consumen en su territorio, constituyen el mayor mercado del orbe. Además se sabe que 70 por ciento del dinero se lava ahí, significando, dice Castro Lima, ...que las mafias que operan en su territorio dominen 90 por ciento del lucro del gran negocio, left in the hands of the U.S. mafia .

In Afghanistan opium production disappeared between 1996-2001 because the Taliban to the drug considered anti-Islamic: today, with the invasion and U.S. occupation, illegal transactions

bloom and the region produces 70 percent of opium

world.

In our region, the U.S. arms industry is the beneficiary of two-way this war sui generis : America is the main supplier (90 percent) of weapons to

cartels operating here and armies The fight! doubling exports and benefits. To the north, the dollars, to the south, the dead. Castro Lima

right in saying that the intention is to crush popular and revolutionary movements that emerge in Latin America and the intimidation or neutralization of such regional initiatives

UNASUR. So is undermining any expression of state jurisdiction, whether in Canada, Mexico or Venezuela, which interferes with the fluid access

United States and its business partners to vital resources such as electricity, gas and oil. is in the territory of the narcopotencia

and not in Colombia, Mexico, Central America or the Amazon, where, in the words of Castro Lima

... should lock the main fight against drug trafficking. http://jsaxef.blogspot.com

Thursday, September 9, 2010

Milena Velba Milky Bavaria

Macondo Warnings

John Saxe-Fernández, La Jornada, Thursday September 9, 2010.

site The outbreak of Macondo in the Gulf of Mexico, which caused the biggest spill and environmental disaster in U.S. history and the world, is a sign of what it means for the planet's biosphere and humanity was the depletion of natural resources non-renewable, in this case

peak oil, its dangers and environmental, socio-economic and politico-military. The proliferation of exploration and development in inaccessible places, considered the last frontier in pursuit of finite natural resources, whether in the deepwater Gulf, on the west coast of Greenland, on glaciers or in the wilderness of the vast Amazon risks and costs involved, some impossible to quantify given the irreversible nature and also for damage to nature with effect today and on future generations: in the Gulf of Mexico, where he recently recorded another oil rig explosion, damage the biosphere are immeasurable for the extinction of life forms in the food key, affecting the existence of niches and delicate, complex and vulnerable ecological systems. At best a partial recovery of the habitat, it will take decades.

But

peak oil is not restricted to environmental disasters such Macondo, is ostensibly a dangerous exacerbation of conflict and militarization of international relations of power, with enormous human destruction, and civilization, as in the case of wars of aggression against Iraq, Afghanistan and harassment against Iran and Venezuela. It

clarify

peak oil does not mean the end of oil, but conventional oil depletion, ie, easily accessible, inexpensive, high quality, which also, in this first decade of the century, is beginning to register in many metals and minerals.

When the U.S. finally recognized how accurate that prediction turned geologist M. King Hubbert (made in 1956), that its oil reserves would reach its maximum extraction in about 14 years (1970) and henceforth observe a decrease in production accelerated, the effects were profound in its foreign policy and military, The vulnerability that leads to the dependence

to deploy strategic urban / suburban and the vast military-industrial apparatus.

The babbling for the development of renewable energy and energy savings were drowned by Reagan and monopolies, in favor of a military

, which explains in part why, after the end of the USSR, followed by the path of spending and military modernization and aggressive militarism, para-militarization and mercenaries of its foreign policy with a pronounced contempt and violation of international criminal law. The state of emergency

and state terrorism

, In force since the U.S. dropped atomic bombs on Japan's population, is stressed. Furthermore, under the National Security Act of 1947, Truman institutionalized criminality

State, under cover of plausible deniability.

The attack on the Twin Towers offered as Condoleeza Rice said the Security Council of Bush, a great opportunity to change the U.S. strategic posture , which meant that, as in the Hitler era, it established the preventive war, aggression, conquest and stepped aside international law for access to oil, Iraq is still occupied with 50 thousand troops and large bases, now called consulates protected by tens of thousands of contractors from the State Department, from a larger embassy to the Vatican, hatched a few months ago the destruction of the Oil Workers Union of Iraq, a brutal operation as used against the SME in Mexico, while the U.S. continues, with the approval of local puppets, managing the business to operate one of the largest reserves of conventional oil.

http://jsaxef.blogspot.com